For providers, consultancies & software houses
Win the bid with measured quality.
Most suppliers ask the buyer for trust. You attach an independent CAI floor to the contract, and a rubric neither party owns grades the delivery — whatever stack you delivered it in. A differentiator no slide deck can match.
Self-serve · every major language you deliver in · Start free on a repo you own · The first full report is on us.
Why offer it before you're asked
The buyer can't read the code.
The problem
You're judged on demos, deadlines and trust. Every bidder claims clean, maintainable, well-tested — so the cheapest credible bid wins.
You make quality checkable
You set the bar in writing — a measured-quality clause, offered before you're asked. An independent rubric grades it, the verdict is the same every scan, and it travels into the contract as a binding appendix.
What you put on the table
Four deliverables.
In the bid — a public audit
A real, published survey of your own code. The sell-sheet is your work, independently surveyed — the most-improved repo you have makes the case.
In the contract — a measured-quality clause
A contract profile: CAI floor, per-lens minimums, no critical CVEs, required frameworks — verified per scan, attested, with a changelog.
During delivery — visible trajectory
Scheduled scans make the climb visible. The trajectory itself becomes a sales asset for the next bid.
At handover — attestation (signed)
A signed delivery verification: verdict as a PDF, suppressions disclosed, CycloneDX SBOM and CWE-tagged findings. Produced via Assay.
One standard across every engagement
You deliver in whatever the client asked for. The same clause, the same rubric and the same score now cover the .NET engagement, the Java one and the Node one — so "our quality standard" is a number you can put in every bid, instead of a claim that only really holds where you're strongest.
Close the loop
Scan → fix → prove.
Watchdog turns the audit into a task list; the next scan proves the fix. Nothing an agent can fake.
Watchdog scans
The repo is analysed against the agreed profile, run after run — a baseline at the start, a verdict at delivery, the trend in between.
A GitHub marker issue tracks it
One issue carries the open findings. Your team fixes via the API or MCP — remediation runs between visits, not just when billing hours on-site.
The re-scan proves it
The scan is the arbiter — "done" can't be faked. The marker issue closes itself when the findings genuinely stop firing.
The scan is the arbiter — "done" can't be faked. Remediation runs between visits, not just when billing hours on-site.
SAMPLE · DELIVERY VERIFICATION
Delivery verification — payments-core
- Contract profile — v3 · rubric frozen at signature
- Scan — #14 · commit 8c41f2e
- CAI — 82 ≥ floor 80 — pass
- Security & compliance lens — 78 ≥ 75 — pass
- Critical CVEs — 0 (ceiling 0) — pass
- Suppressions disclosed — 2
Neither party can move the number — not us, not you, not the buyer. What an 80 floor is made of: every always-on lens Strong or better, no lens Critical — decomposable, not opaque. Delivery artifacts are activated on Assay.
Neutrality is the moat
The measurer has no stake.
Never a delivering party
Canine Development never develops or consults on a codebase it also scores — never on both ends of one contract.
No success fees
Revenue is the subscription — identical whether a delivery passes or fails.
Identical rubric
The same versioned rubric scores you whoever pays; pin it frozen for the contract's duration. Your buyer doesn't have to trust us either — the standard is open to verify.
Make quality your bid weapon.
Self-serve · first full report free · see pricing · talk to us